The reason behind Alfie Kohn’s article “From Degrading to
De-Grading” is to promote awareness of how grades can negatively affect
students’ learning. Kohn gave numerous of examples of how grades cannot
identify student’s skills and cannot be used to evaluate their potential and
understanding. Some of the examples mentioned in the article were: grades
encourage cheating, grades spoil teachers’ relationships with students, and
grades waste a lot of time that could be spent on learning. It is true that
these things can happen, but teachers can be proactive about grading and create
a way for students to agree upon so that grades can be a goal to achieve
instead of a negative perspective. One of the ways that I would grade students
is to balance every aspect of the curriculum with rubrics and standards. I will
make sure students understand what is being graded on and why it is that way.
For example, I will put emphasis on participation, open-ended test questions,
and reflective assignments/projects so that students can have a choice and be
responsible with the results of their actions.
The author
ended the article by giving examples of what he did with his students to ease
their concerns with grades. He said by doing so students are more focus on
learning the material without worrying about what grade they will earn. The
author also stated that teachers who gave up control and work with their
students to develop a different system of grading will reduce the harm that
traditional grading affect on those students.
This article does not fit fully
into any of NETS standard because it did not mention about technology tools or
online sources in learning. It did however, mentioned about the ability to not
give grades to students by focusing on what needed to be learned so that they
can expand their interests and creativeness.
I believe
there is purpose and value in a grade because without it there are no goals to
set for students for them to work hard towards reaching them. Grades are a way
to assess student’s potential and ability. When students know that they don’t
need to work hard to get an A, they would all be doing the bare minimum to go
on to the next level. Grades should not be seen as something negative or a
barrier to students learning. It should however, be a measurement/rubric for
evaluating students’ progress. Teachers use grades to see what he or she needs
to further emphasize on so that students understand the materials before going
on to the next level. For example, students will not be able to understand
Trigonometry without know basic Geometry. There should be a balance in grading.
Teachers should not put too much emphasis on tests/projects because not
everyone will do well on them. I believe by assessing many aspects of students’
effort will be far more effective than their ability to get the right answer.
When teachers focus more on creating a learning environment where students are
eager to learn and are curious about what they are learning, they will be more
successful at what they are teaching.
Nhu Y
APA Citation:
Kohn, A. (1999). From Degrading to De-Grading. High School Magazine, March 1999,
Nhu Y,
ReplyDeleteI agree that grades are necessary for student learning. Grading should include individualized feedback that assesses the student's strengths and weaknesses, like the rubrics you mentioned. I see grades as a helpful tool that not only motivate learning and future success, but also establish a measurement of progress. I believe that grades help, not hurt, student achievement.
-Marisa Gorczynski